home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Columbia Kermit
/
kermit.zip
/
newsgroups
/
misc.19941031-19941221
/
000116_news@columbia.edu_Sat Nov 12 07:17:27 1994.msg
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
2020-01-01
|
3KB
Received: from apakabar.cc.columbia.edu by watsun.cc.columbia.edu with SMTP id AA23209
(5.65c+CU/IDA-1.4.4/HLK for <kermit.misc@watsun.cc.columbia.edu>); Sat, 12 Nov 1994 08:41:25 -0500
Received: by apakabar.cc.columbia.edu id AA09237
(5.65c+CU/IDA-1.4.4/HLK for kermit.misc@watsun); Sat, 12 Nov 1994 08:41:23 -0500
Path: news.columbia.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!newsxfer.itd.umich.edu!gatech!udel!chopin.udel.edu!not-for-mail
From: darkstar@chopin.udel.edu (Jerry Alexandratos)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.kermit.misc
Subject: Help With Transfer Rate
Date: 12 Nov 1994 02:17:27 -0500
Organization: Broken Toys Unlimited
Lines: 43
Message-Id: <3a1q67$53m@chopin.udel.edu>
Nntp-Posting-Host: chopin.udel.edu
Apparently-To: kermit.misc@watsun.cc.columbia.edu
Is it just me or am I missing something plainly obvious? Here's what's
going on:
I have MS-Kermit (v3.13) on a 386 over an ethernet connection. On the
host side, I'm running C-Kermit (5A(189)) on a Sun 4. With the
following settings I get a average CPS of about 8500 (or at least
that's what the status bar on MSK says).
MS-Kermit C-Kermit
set flow none set flow none
set windows 3 set windows 3
set send pack 5000 set send pack 5000
set rec pack 5000 set rec pack 5000
set file display none
set file names literal
However, when I run C-Kermit from my Linux box I don't get anywhere
near the same performance. FYI, the two machines are right next to
each other, and have the same hardware (actually, they may have
different ethernet cards). I connect to the same host. The .mykermit
file on the local machine looks the same as the above C-Kermit one
except that the file display line reads ``set file display crt''. I
found that fullscreen did indeed slow it down a lot, and that there
wasn't much difference between crt and serial, and that the improvement
over none wasn't so significant that I wanted to give up knowing how
the file transfer was going. (Yes, I got all of this from the C-Kermit
book--a must get!).
So, am I doing something wrong? Is the report generated by MSK wrong,
and I should really look at the host's `stat' report? Is there
something that I should be setting since I'm going from C-Kermit to
C-Kermit? Am I so illiterate that I totally missed something in the
book?
Thanks in advance for any and all help.
--Jerry
--
|> Jerry Alexandratos ** "vengo de la tierra del <|
|> darkstar@strauss.udel.edu ** fuego ten cuidado cuando <|
|> darkstar@canary.pearson.udel.edu ** llamas mi nombre..." <|